Hi folks,
Had to join so I could add my 2 cents worth. Have read the whole thread since I got mine back in mid December.
Golly, it seems that some of you would complain if you were hung with a new rope!
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/Smileys/default/grin.gif I don't suppose you complain that your creator gave you eyes that aren't photometrically calibrated and that in spite of an overall field of view of nearly 180 degrees that we only see clearly for less than 2 degrees of that. And there are many many other limitations of the eye/brain. But, there isn't any technology that can exceed them in all factors. Fact is, they work very well for their intended purpose. So does the Seek.
With an accurate IR thermometer, how long would it take to map the 32136 points that the Seek can do in an instant? Yes, it may be more accurate except in the time it takes you to make those measurements, the first ones have likely changed. With any imaging IR device, you would see those changes as they occur.
That I can see in a glance a hot circuit breaker, leaks around windows and doors, an overheating electronic component for $200 is really amazing. As Aurora mentioned, a lens for one of his other cameras cost more that the Seek.
Does a fireman really care that his view is a few degrees off? No, he needs instant information of where the hot spots are and an imaging device like the Seek fits that requirement. In other words, for precision, yes, spend that 50K. For seeing the unseen- get a Seek!
Was I disappointed that there was a gradient when I first got it? Yes but it still could do the basics I was hoping for. Now that the gradient is gone, it's even better. Is it perfect? Na. But, again, I can see something I wouldn't have been able to with my budget. Temp wise, I haven't checked it's absolute accuracy but it seems within reason I.E. usable. My room is about 70F, my heater around 425F. Yup, about right.
As I see it, emissivity is something important for accurate measurements. As most scenes are of mixed emissivities, which one do you choose? If you choose Highly Polished Brass at an emissivity of .03 what's that going to do for the rest of the measurements? Most emissivities seem to be lumped at the high end, so is it really that big of a deal for casual use? You would have to keep changing emissivities to accurately measure everything in the scene. Do you really need to know accurately what the temperature of that bear's nose is or is it good enough to know that he is there?
Fact is, I didn't get it to be a precise scientific instrument, I got it to see the world of IR, looking for leaks, hot spots and just plain fun. It meets all those requirements.
As to noise, I have seen it vary. I don't know the parameters but I would expect more noise on a narrow temp range. I have seen it produce some sharp images and some fuzzy ones. If they improve it, that would be great. If not, I'm still very happy.
Thanks for listening, no flaming intended, just asking folks to lighten up a bit. In spite of it's limitations, this is an
amazing thing we hold in our hands!
Ken