I am just an individual, which use his small money for hobby, and get out what's possible from the devices I have.
...
...
It is not evil to enhance the possibilities of your things at home.
They can't control what you do at home, ...
I agree, and while doing so might still in some cases be in violation of the rules (or user agreements), nobody would find out if we just keep it at home. But we all come here to share information & benefit from each other's findings. I don't think any of us nerds posting our findings here has any intent of doing any harm with or without these devices, but as we all are becoming increasingly aware the people who are out to kill everyone they disagree with are using the internet for more than just recruiting and propaganda. If the "tech" members of their organizations decide to look for such information, they will find this site. That is what the regulations are trying to avoid. The risk might be very low, but we all need to decide if the benefits are worth taking the risk.
I see basically 2 risks:
1) a government finds out that we have exposed sensitive information & comes after the individuals deemed guilty
2) "rogues" get hold of the information & use it to facilitate causing harm & damage.
Both risks may well be very small, but if #2 happens, #1 will likely follow since the first thing the authorities do when someone commits a "heinous act" is go to the person's residence & confiscate all computers & "devices". And if any code is on there from this board it will be tracked to here & eventually the author.
Therefore, in my opinion, those of us who have posted code are at greatest risk. Perhaps even if the code does not have any forbidden feature as posted but was edited by the "rogues" to have such feature. Putting the feature in the code makes it easiest for someone else to use it while just saying "here's what I did" leaves the programming to the user. The thought that the code I posted could still ensnare me causes me concern. Again, the risk may be small, but nobody wants to have their assets confiscated and the first half thrown in jail.
My "gut feeling" is that the most likely scenario is that Seek would go to the US government and say "Those guys are exposing sensitive information and need to be shut down (and on top of that they are embarrassing us)." and the USG would then go to the Australian government and ask that the offending information be removed. Just a total guess...
Because the Seek Support won't give answers, ...
Probably at least in part because it would have been an export violation.
However you make it, it will just be harder for people on the legal side.
You got that right. Especially regarding those "bullet accelerating devices".
Technically, though, decompiling, reverse engineering, etc. is usually in violation of user's agreement with the manufacturer, so to be on the truly legal side we would have to pay up for the better device/software...if it exists.