Moving images certainly look better than still ones.
This is may be result of different human eye sensitivity to different color, so a few degrees temperature gradient can be easier notice at the end of Iron palette than at the beginning, where there is more blue channel less sensitive to our eye
So, gradient can be present in images at different temperatures and the same, but more difficult to notice, especially when I'm not sure-they use 8bit (256) colors palettes ONLY?
Can not prove this while in their software LUT directory there is complete garbage, and there is no classic LUTs but coffe cup with LUT applied
I use 16bit Iron LUT so it will be interesting to see what difference it makes to output thermal LUT mapped RGB image.
Anyway it looks like inside this Seek dongle thing is quite hot >35*C around sensor, so this metal lens holder is cooler in typical 20*C-25*C ambient temperature and with hole in one side when shutter operates and pumps air at each calibration event, another side of sensor must be better cooled by lens holder and maybe this creates as mentioned earlier those gradients on calibration frames too.
Does lens used in Seek reverse image (flip) ?
It could be interesting to find out which corners looks more hot/cold on real hardware sensor block relative to the side shutter operates.
So, lets say we look at this Seek sensor from the top, we have shutter on lower 156 pixels side right where shutter operates and question is which part of the sensor senses this hotter gradient temperature?
Can't do it now while haven't got this Seek in hands yet, however histograms from a few calibration frames from raw sensor data provided there, really looked like this calibration frame image standard deviation of pixel values is going down and values itself lower in time, so it canexplain that this gradient improves a litle bit and might stabilize at those +/-2*C at some conditions, but it looks very bad on output images even if it is temperature difference lower than 5*C