A friend of mine has the 289 and loaned it to me to try out. They really like the meter. Personally, I would take that 189 you show over the 289. IMO, that 189 is just a nice all around meter.
+1, as I own these three, 189 is my 1st choice, no contest here.
Imo, 87V is more a technician's DMM hence limited features, while 287/9 is more like a miniaturized full features bench DMM with all the bells & whistles, the 189 has the sweet spot and also boot instantly like 87V does, and almost has all the 287/9 features except graphical chart, also the dot matrix LCD at 287/9 is sux compared to solid dark and sharp LCD segments, believe most people are with me here on the display part. And 189 uses AA cells.
I agree on the 87V and never understood the continued hype surrounding it. Their primary market is techs and electricians so I guess it makes some sense. I would consider it a very high end meter for these groups.
UNI-T made what I consider to be a clone of the 289. I felt they had made some improvements over the 289's UI. Overall I like how the UT181A drives. Menus on both meters are easy to navigate without picking up a manual (unlike my Gossen). UNI-T could make a few changes to that 181A that I feel would go a long way to improve it. I don't see Fortive changing the direction Fluke and others.
I think there is room for a modern, high quality version of that meter. Maybe Brymen will take a shot at a 289 clone. They already have what I consider decent replacement for the 189.