While the lack of a fuse on the 10A range is not a great feature, there does seem to be rather more FUD than is strictly necessary on this thread IMHO.
The problem is your attitude.
Mains AC is nothing to be blase about. Even if there's only a 0.1% chance of death/injury, it's still a non-zero chance of death/injury.
PS: You don't know if the person who's reading this's meter has a defect or not. Just because you survived doesn't mean he will.
Fungus, there isn't really any need for that!
Re-read your own reply: it is 100% fear, uncertainty and doubt. The only statistic is one plucked from thin air.
Respectfully, I was trying to come in with a measured response to what I'd read here on this thread. There were few, as far as I could see, real facts backing up the need for someone to blow $200 on a DMM rather than $20, other than fear, uncertainty and doubt.
To a _lot_ of people (in fact I'd say it's the vast majority) it's the difference between making the purchase of any DMM at all. In that respect, I'd wager that they are actually safer by having a cheap DMM than not having one at all. At least they can measure whether something's live or not. That same person who is unlikely to spend $200 is also unlikely to spend a similar amount on getting an electrician out to check it for them just in case.
People are welcome to choose whatever DMM they want, and allowed to make an informed choice. But that choice is up to them, and real informed facts should be the basis of that decision. By the same token, should we not all be purchasing the "Fluke 28 II Ex Intrinsically Safe" DMM at $1200 or so because other less expensive Flukes are, apparently, not intrinsically safe?
I wasn't trying to make for a battle here, so please, let's have a reasoned discussion rather than a pissing contest, that will be far more useful to everyone.