You're both missing the point. The actual value of the target isn't that important. What matters most is the value you get from the test device at the testing points.
For example, if you send the loaded PCB out for calibration, the cal lab will certify the values they read at each test point. That calibration is your reference, not what values showed up on Mouser's shopping cart. The specific component value doesn't matter at all, as long as it can be calibration verified. Then you check against the calibration values to see if your meter is in spec. Is this inductor 1.0039345mH or 1.003955mH? If that difference matters to you, you need to get it calibrated anyway. For me, if it says 1.00mH, the rest of the digits aren't that interesting.
For my needs, all the values were close enough to see where there are and are not issues with my LCR meter. I doubt I'd ever have the PCB calibrated, but I can refer to my saved cal data and see if my meters are still consistent in a year or 10.
All that said, the values between the ST42 and the ST2832 were close enough. The ST42 tweezers were used directly on each test device. I suppose, if you actually care enough to get it calibrated, you can have a direct tweezer test and a separate test point test done for reference of both testing methods.
I think you're both thinking too much like this is a functional circuit where the component value actually has an effect on something.