Author Topic: Test repeatability formula  (Read 1389 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DavidDLCTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 755
  • Country: us
Test repeatability formula
« on: September 09, 2015, 03:13:53 pm »
I need to do a tester repeatability.

Wikipedia says:

Repeatability or test–retest reliability is the variation in measurements taken by a single person or instrument on the same item, under the same conditions, and in a short period of time

But there is no formula nor targets.

Does anybody have the formula and targets for it ?

David.
 

Offline Neilm

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1551
  • Country: gb
Re: Test repeatability formula
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2015, 06:27:32 pm »
This depends on what you are testing. For example, a multi-meter measuring a resistor should be very repeatable - within a digit. However, I did read an international standard on testing transformer oil that says if you get within about 7% for reputability it is doing good.
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tesla referral code https://ts.la/neil53539
 

Offline tggzzz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 20144
  • Country: gb
  • Numbers, not adjectives
    • Having fun doing more, with less
Re: Test repeatability formula
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2015, 09:37:28 pm »
I need to do a tester repeatability.

Wikipedia says:

Repeatability or test–retest reliability is the variation in measurements taken by a single person or instrument on the same item, under the same conditions, and in a short period of time

But there is no formula nor targets.

Does anybody have the formula and targets for it ?

David.

Depends on what the specific situation requires.

I know of one piece of test equipment that was accurate to 0.1dB (of attenuation) but had a stability and repeatability of 0.001dB. Since the requirement was to measure changes in attenuation, the absolute accuracy was relatively unimportant.
There are lies, damned lies, statistics - and ADC/DAC specs.
Glider pilot's aphorism: "there is no substitute for span". Retort: "There is a substitute: skill+imagination. But you can buy span".
Having fun doing more, with less
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf