GPIB FUNSorry for the late reply, to all who are helping with that... been baby sitting that old computer for 3 hours while trying to install Windows2000. Now back on TEA to report....
RAM : do'nt know what it is for sure, BIOS says nothing, only the totla capacity that's installed. However looking at them in the flesh, they look "modern"... and the user manual says they are 164 pin SDRAM.
Also says as I said earlier, that the motherboard can take only 32MB sticks. There are two slots available, so 64MB max, which is what there is presently, so no room for improvement there.
@ Robert : thanks for digging out that CD ! You won't need to ship it though (lucky you).. because that random ISO I just downloaded, did the trick, and it didn't even ask me for license key or anything or the sort... strange, but hey not complaining of course.
So here goes, 3 hours shrunk in a few lines (hopefully) :
- Entered the BIOS to make sure the CD Drive was in the boot sequence, before the hard drive. It was, good.
- PC none the less refuse to boot from the CD drive...
- Tried with my WinXP install CD, which I know boots fine... no joy. So there must be some kind of H/W problem within the CD driver itself, my luck !
Told you I was cursed...
- So I start Win95 instead, and the Win2000 CD auto starts ! It asks :" I detect you have an older version of Windows, do you want to upgrade ?"
- Yeah ! Don't need to boot from the Cd, I can install it from Win95 instead !!!
- So I did that. It copied a few files quickly on the HDD, then rebooted.
- It booted from the HDD and started a text mode installer, yeah... looking good.
- Asked what partition I wanted to use... the 2GB HDD is split in two 1GB partitions. Was worried 1GB might not be enough for Win2000, so I tried to merge both partitions (hence wiping win95 in the process of course). but that failed. The partitioning too was not capable enough to allow for that. It let me delete the second partition, but not delete the first one !
So, no choice, had to recreate the second partition and format it, which took a while in itself. So, since I was stuck with 1GB partition, I might as well leave Win95 alone and install Win2000 on the second partition, hoping there would be enough space.
So I did that, and after about 2 hours, it succeeded ! Yes, look at that...
SO now I have boot loader to select Win95 on the first partition, or Win2000 on the second partition.
Right there Win2000 is cool. A "normal" windows refuses to install on anything other than the first partition, and won't install a boot loader. It thinks it's the only OS in the world...
So happy with that indeed.
So I started Win2000 for the first time... and was surprised that it booted in a "normal'" time, was not slow. No worse than Win95, perfectly acceptable.
The desktop/ GUI loads up just fine, doesn't feel slow. Mouse pointer is responsive, Start menu as well... loading apps is OK too. Looked at the System Monitor, it says only 50% of the RAM is being used.
Looking at the splah screen during startup, it looks like the version I have is " Server Family ".
At boot it keeps poping-up an assustant with a dozen tabs asking me to configure a trillions server/network related things. Not understanding any of it, I skip this part...
It also tried to scare me during the install : " I detect that this computer has already be assigned at least one dynamic IP address".
ME : " Well, good, I assume that's ADSL box talking to the computer automatically and giving it an IP address, that's great, it works !!! "
Computer : " NO, DUMB ASS !!! Dynamic IP is BAD, you need this computer/ Server to have a STATIC IP for thigns to work properly ! Here is the config dialo, please make the necessary changes immediately ! ".
Eh ?!
I guess a static IP is good for a server indeed... makes it easier for the clients to find you... but I didn't care, and wanted the dynamic IP to work, so since I do'nt know what I am doing, I said " Sorry get lost, I will keep my dynamic IP ".
Computer : " You're a fool, but if that's what you want !! "
Then it asked me some more stuff I have no clue about : " What licensing scheme do you want ? Per client or per seat ?? "
Me : WHAT ?!
I chose the second option, " Per seat ", because I like a good seat, thinking if that was the wrong answer hopefully the guys on TEA can help me fix that later on....
So eventually it installed and I could start test driving it, because to my amazement as I said, the GUI / Desktop is actually plenty responsive enough to be usable.
Actually I didn't even see, during boot, an option asking me if I wanted to start in console mode rather than loading the desktop... maybe you need to press F8 like with Win95 ?!...
Lots of goods news :
- Just like on Win95, the Network / ADSL Box attache USB stick is visible out of the box in the explorer
- 3COM Ethernet card works out of the box as well.
- The Matrox Millenium Graphics card I added in that computer, works right away as well
- USB works as well ! Tried a USB stick, works just fine !!
I guess that's all because Win2000 is a bit newer than 95, so there are more drivers built-in.
Tried Internet Explorer, but no joy, just like Netscape in Win95, it fails to load websites other than google.com
However since Win2000 is 4 or 5 years newer than Win2000, maybe there is a web browser that can actually work on this platform ?
I need to Google to see what is the most recent browser that can run on W2K, and give that a try.
It's W2K version 5.00.2195, if that's any help.
OK !!!
So let's now see if TEKTOOL will work or not now ! As the saying goes... hoping for the best but expecting the worst... place your bets !
Stay tuned...be right back...