...Seriously, dude - exactly how much hexavalent chromium residue do you think could possibly remain on that blade? How real IS the 'danger' ?
-Pat
Enough that it is reasonable to warn people.When you're planning on warning people, you have to also consider cumulative exposure when you don't know how much exposure a person may already have. Any exposure matters, especially with these kinds of chemicals. Their testing revealed there was enough that it could contribute to a person's total exposure. So they are warning people.
I would rather too much warning than business as usual. Business as usual always benefits business, not people.
Just how much hexavalent chromium exposure have you had in your lifetime already? Do you have even a clue...? Yeah, me neither. And remember, just because one regulatory body says
x level of exposure is safe, does not make it so, or that those numbers even match what another regulatory body says.
OSHA in particular has a long, documented history of being swayed towards the interests of large corporate interests, so even that "standard" for exposure is by it's nature suspect.
Stainless steel is now known to
not be the benign, inert everywhere material we once assumed it to be. Just because you've thought it was all your life doesn't make it so; things change.
mnem
The only constant is change. Adapt or die.