Well stop cursing slightly more than 50% of us British voters, it was something like 45% of the voters voted for this shower of idiots we have in power. Its because we have so many political parties in this country that split the other votes so many ways that the Conservatives managed to get a majority, we need a electoral reform and we need it fast.
The US had to learn gerrymandering from somewhere, right?
"many political parties" is not a general problem; it just plays bad with the notion of "winner takes all" district. We have, since the introduction of crazy religious people and fascists in our parliament, the Riksdagen, 8 political parties. No party has gotten over 45% of the votes for a long time. Coalition is the norm. The representation is proportional, so, in theory, as long as your party has more than 4% of the votes nationwide, you will get a corresponding number of seats.
On the other hand, the Oracle (
shudder) stored procedure that calculates the averaging-out model which allocates the last few seats in Riksdagen is, reportedly, a very convoluted piece of PL/SQL. Not many are said to comprehend it. I've never seen it, but have talked to people who have. It is written as an implementation of the law, but where is the transitional competence that understands constitutional law and database theory and practice? (This is a central tallying function; not electronic voting, something I together with every computer security professional I've heard, thoroughly dislike, and which we do not have. Every vote is a piece of paper.)
By the way, we're in a constitutional crisis as of last Monday, since the PM lost a confidence vote over rent regulation. Feels a bit like Italy.