If you decide to keep and plumb in the R/O then fit one of these to a Human drinking spout which might seem dumb adding minerals back in but it tastes WAY better in Tea and Coffee and is far less likely to give gut troubles due to the pH. Something like this https://www.gpawholefoods.com.au/buy/remineralisation-cartridge-in-line/RO-IN-REMIN?gclid=Cj0KCQjw7pKFBhDUARIsAFUoMDasFuDUF1m7f9qXex-UDjdHK_YO5rSfLdTyeMMRwlPr5-pRuPM5NRsaApo1EALw_wcB
Oh please! One place I don't expect to find this kind of pseudo-scientific claptrap reiterated is by people on here. How is pure water at pH 7.0, compared to remineralised water at pH 7.4, is going to mess with the pH balance of the gut considering that the first place that water is going to visit is a stomach that has a pH of between 1.5 and 3.5 and that is in a body that has its own active feedback system for controlling the gut pH?
Bear in mind that pH is a log scale, so the pH difference between pure and remineralised water of 0.4 (10
0.4 = 2.5) is dwarfed by several orders of magnitude by the pH difference between water and the stomach contents of pH 3.5 to 5.5 (10
3.5 ~ 3,200 to 10
5.5 ~ 320,000) . If drinking pure pH 7.0 water that is 0.4 pH different (2.5 times more acidic; or more accurately 2.5 times
less basic) from 'normal' pH 7.4 remineralised water caused "
gut problems due to pH" then the consumption of coffee (pH 5), orange juice (pH 3.3) Coca-Cola (pH 2.5, nearly 32000 times more acidic than pure water) would cause devastating symptoms. That guff about pure versus remineralised water causing gut troubles due to pH just
does not make scientific sense.
The non Pumped R/O membranes are generally less of an issue as they tend to leave more Ions in the water. Be it R/O of most high grades, Demin or Distilled the damage it can do can be terminal to what it touches including the Human Body.
Oh dear, it gets worse. Please cite, even a single, peer-reviewed scientific paper that demonstrates any of those forms of purified water being 'terminal' to a human body - I'll even permit a paper citing drowning as long as it attributes some of the harm to the purified nature of the water involved.
I don't really want to be so scathing, but it's difficult not to be when someone is holding out that water that is a tiny bit purer than we generally encounter is some kind of serious medical hazard, to the point of using the word 'terminal' associated with 'Human Body' to imply that pure water is a deadly poison. Common sense ought to tell you to be suspicious of such 'information'.
It just goes to show that scientists and engineers are not magically inoculated against believing or repeating old wive's tales, even through we like to think that our supposed rationality protects us from them. What hopefully sets us apart is how we respond once we start applying critical thinking to them.