There is of course the other side that by making that TEA trip you are putting your family at risk of Covid or loosing the breadwinner from it. I've known hard times too but health is more important than property.
Certainly. But if you are starving, your health will be deteriorating, too.
And this lockdown is detrimental to our health, physical and psychological. And there is no real factual evidence that one of the main principals of healers, doctors , ... is being preserved (primum non nocere). Naturally there are assholes partying. On the other hand there are small business owners whose financial existance is being ruined.
It is difficult to find the right balance.
The Public Health Agency of Sweden (Folkhälsomyndigheten) is getting a serious amount of shit thrown at them by people who IMNSHO can think of only one thing at a time and are ravingly adamant about getting more lockdown. Because covid.
At the same time, the agency has a research team that reads
every snippet of science on this disease, and then they assess that with what they know about the adverse health effects of various recommendations, like closing society down.
Very often, they end up with the end sum being "the benefits from severely limiting what people can do, in terms of stopping the pandemic, are at the same time counteracting public health because people in lockdown beat their family members or lose their income" to name but a few of the side effects.
The net result is "Wash your hands, keep your distance, don't travel unless you really have to, don't meet people outside your family you don't really must meet, and you might not infect others if you wear a mask when you must be too close to them." Which isn't as sexy and DOING THINGS as locking down with armoured squad cars on empty streets and military at the border.
Most often, ironically, (at least among the ones I communicate with, which of course is a fat bias) the men hollering loudest for More Oppressive Measures are liberal engineers. Who should think twice before asking to be oppressed for not scientifically provable reasons.
Finally, on death tolls. There's been a lot of talk about our comparatively high death tolls.
Pro primo, we have a NPM style care system for elders. Constantly starved of resources, and with the second or third most common employment form for staff being temporary, by the hour. (are those people going to take the chance of getting a few hours work even if they've got a cold? You bet. And then they'll go to the next care facility, because you'll have to work everywhere to make ends meet. You'll see which nice superspreaders they become..)
Pro secundo, in our statistic reporting, if a car crash victim is (as they are) tested and turns out positive with the virus at autopsy, they become a "covid victim." I'm not certain that is so everywhere.
I think we can tell which method worked best some 4 years after we've gotten this virus down to normal "winter flu" levels. Until then, we're just guessing based on bent and twisted derivata curves.