The Results:No name 1% metal film resistor from Ebay:
Leg diameter: 0.34mm
Value: 240k
Measured Tolerance: -0.06%
Measured Tempco: -459ppm/DegC
IC Touch 1% metal film resistor:
Leg diameter: 0.38mm
Value: 130k
Measured Tolerance: 0.53%
Measured Tempco: 137.5ppm/DegC
Stackpole 24k 1% 50ppm/DegC:
Leg diameter: 0.42mm
Value: 24k
Measured Tolerance: 0.68%
Measured Tempco: 4.5ppm/DegC
Unknown 1% Metal Film:
Leg diameter: 0.49mm
Value: 82.5k
Measured Tolerance: 0.004%
Measured Tempco: 9.3ppm/DegC
Unknown 5% Carbon Film:
Leg diameter: 0.38mm
Value: 120k
Measured Tolerance: 0.86%
Measured Tempco: -671.6ppm/DegC
Unknown 0.1% (Metal Film?)
Leg diameter: 0.61mm
Value: 200k
Measured Tolerance: 0.02%
Measured Tempco: 11.9ppm/DegC
Old resistor, not sure of the type:
Leg diameter: 0.8mm
Value: 220k
Measured Tolerance: 0.33%
Measured Tempco: -28.7ppm/DegC
Dale 1% (metal film ?):
Leg diameter: 0.63mm
Value: 500k
Measured Tolerance: -0.2%
Measured Tempco: 5.33ppm/DegC
Wirewound resistor:
Leg diameter: 0.63mm
Value: 100k
Measured Tolerance: 0.1%
Measured Tempco: 28.76ppm/DegC
Conclusion:You get what you pay for I guess. The cheaper you pay, the thinner are the legs and the higher tempco is. It's important to note though that even the cheapest no name ebay metal film resistors are as good as carbon film resistors.