Now you're being confused by it. The standard British, and most European country's way of writing the date is year/month/day, not "year/day/month" as you've written.
OK, then how come old handwritten letters were format day/month/year?
I did originally post it in the format you are correcting me towards but I changed it to match what nfmax had written.
The ISO date format (YYYY-MM-DD) is, IMNSHO, superior in every regard to all the other ways of writing the date, not least because it has a natural monotonic sorting order if just treated as a decimal number (ignoring the punctuation).
Of course it's superior in every regard. It's British.
No, the form 3-Letter-Abbrev-DD-YYYY is superior to all others; there is
zero ambiguity AND it is only one more character in the CH$, FFS.
Think aboot all the wasted characters spent arguing this fekking single concept, and that one extra character means squat. It is only
some people and their compulsive need to reduce
everything to numbers which makes this an issue
at all.
I prefer 24-hour time with the colon as well, since it allows tacking on seconds with zero ambiguity; but that is probably objectively a bit weird.
mnem
* sworn before me on Jan 24, 2022 09:00:47 local time *