depending on your location and the item in question Canon may have a flat fee repair service. They charged me 100 flat for repairing an ef 24-105 STM which I accidentally dropped (1.5 m drop) while in Pearl Harbor.
Took them an incredible 3 day turn around, and the lens was pretty beaten up.
It never hurts to check their professional website, and if you register your stuff you may get a decent repair discount.
Of course I could also interest you in my 5D II which I have sitting around, I am mostly using my 50D.
What is with the 5D II that makes you prefer to use the 50D? I have a 50D and also a almost new 7D but its the 50D that I feel is the better all round camera producing better colour balance and sharper images.
50D vs 7D: agreed-
I have the 50D with a Sigma 18-200 and it is my everyday camera when travelling or doing stuff for ebay or similar tasks.
I also have the 5D II with the 17-40L, the 28-105L IS USM, 28-105 STM, 70-200 F4L is-USM and the Tamron 150 - 600 ...
The problem I have is that I do not have time or space or travel allowance to lug around about 6 - 7 kg of equipment.
The 50D has an integrated flash that I am using all of the time, whereas I need an external flash with the 5DII (Otherwise I might be using it more, with the 28-105 STM ...
TBH it's lazyness paired with practicality. Given the fact that my life apparently hates me I just feel that I currently don't care about any better image quality or raws or more MPs, because I don't have any time to work with those photos anyway.
I don't get into any areas where the better image quality of the 5D would count. So the hassle to quality factor is currently heavily tilting towards my 50D. And I would go ahead and just buy another one if it went kaboom.