On a completely different note.
I was cleaning off some breadboards yesterday to clear the way for doing some actual prototyping work and in the process of stripping them down found an AD586 5V voltage reference on one of them. I bought a couple some time back and, at the time, didn't have a voltmeter with either enough precision or accuracy to judge how close to 'the truth' they were as they came out of the factory. That is no longer true, I've now got the Agilent 34461A so for fun I thought I'd run them against it.
Now, we've all heard that people like AD and LT (now one and the same) tend to produce stuff that's a lot better than nominal specifications would suggest, as long as you're talking about one of the better spec variants rather than the stuff that's been deliberately binned as lower grade. OK, so this is going to be anecdote rather than evidence but I thought it would be informative to see if that was true for these parts.
These two are AD586LNs, so the 2nd best grade out of 4 grades (the best grade is ±2mV and 2 ppm/ºC) - the nominal spec for this grade is ±2.5 mV and 5 ppm/ºC. So I measured both references - sample 1 was 5.000 018 V (3.6 ppm high), sample 2 was 4.999843 V (31.3 ppm low). Pretty good for parts with a nominal 500 ppm (0.05%) tolerance.
For completeness - the uncertainties on the 34461A for this reading, range and time since cal (2 yr) are ±260 uV for k=2.