One day I will have it on my bench.
You and I, you and I...
Me as well ... one day ...
I could be bothered if someone pushed it into my arms. If they are not occupied. With, for example, the Times Electronics DMM. Seriously, while I have a need of precision and repeatability that my Prema does not fulfill due to its 100V limitation (Prema does only calibrations now, no other servicing like removing that dastardly scanner), when I go for a high-end DMM, I
expect like to have some functions which are not only a benefit for volt-nuttery . So what would it be?
Before seeing the Time Electronics DMM with its very attractive kV ranges, bets were on the Keithley 2001/2002, as the current measurement function over existing uncut traces would be a real feature.
What else would I want from a premium DMM?
Well, I would want it to be fast. I would want it to have selectable, clearly specified min/max functions.
Like, 100µs vs. 1000ms values (and between and beyond those). I would want it not to have a ominous key named 'Filter' but HW and SW filter and averaging functions (and of the latter selectable length).
I would want it to have a integral, reasonably flat for at least 0.1mHz to 1MHz AC coupling function.
I would like it to perform as a mOhm- and GOhm-meter for most practical stuff (and with that, necessarely the currents for the former and the voltages for the latter). I would like to select my test voltage between (at least) 0.1, 1 and 10V for the 'normal' resistance ranges.
A scaled analogue output besides the connect-to-everything digital interfaces might come convenient.
And if I could get my perfect, personal Eierlegende Wollmilchsau DMM, it would be 2 channel and thereby fulfill the role of the so-called U-I-Functionmeter too. Of course the two would be available for calculations and the various AC parameters like Ueff U^ should be there without much fuss.
Rounding it out would be the ability to select various input resistances/impedances. And why can the well known beasts have only ONE conversion rate for a given resolution, if lucky, with seletable 50/60 Hz suppresion? Why not a variable one?
It could be only me, but even a significant subset of the features listed would hold a far higher appeal than one or two more digits beyond 6.5. And most of it would be feasible without much problems.