We discussed this before, I think? The practical real life impact of the bandwidth difference is negligible. When the difference between SATA and NVMe isn't discernible the difference between NVMe and faster NVMe definitely isn't regardless of benchmarks that make your peener bigger.
No, you pontificated from a place of ignorance while I systematically deconstructed why you were wrong, and then you continued to ignore the clear and obvious proof that you were wrong, repeating the same ignorant BS in different words over and over again, because you refuse to see beyond last year’s technology when next year’s is already in production.
I refuse to engage in ANOTHER such battle of willful ignorance in my place of refuge.
Actually you are wrong on this point, as Scram points out spending the extra for the vast majority of users is not a good bang for the buck.
I run Intel NVME's in one of my systems and they are fine, the systems fast and responsive, I also have used the Samsung Pro and I like the Intel better because of the price difference.
In terms of SSD I have both the 850's and the better 860's and I can't tell you which system has which without checking.
Finally, are NVME better, on paper yes, but I seldom notice any difference between two almost identical configured systems with the difference being one has a SSD and the other is a M.2 NVME. An I/O sequential benchmark shows the M.2 is significantly faster but in everyday use I can't tell the systems apart.