I never saw the point of those CNC tables for PCBs. Too much complexity. I actually made a fair chunk of PCBs in my time, going back to secondary school, using photoresist + UV which is pretty cheap and easy. If it's a really simple one shot, just draw the damn thing out with a marker... works down to 0805 / SOIC at least....
Edit: this was a 3 hour turnaround including the design and construction...
Even the parts for that one were recycled off a duff HP scope, apart from the AD8307 which was aliexpress gold.
(forget controlled impedance etc - good enough for HF / low VHF mainly)
I've made more PCBs than I can count from many methods, including using a ditto machine back in the day and laser printer photo-resist. There simply isn't anything really convenient to turn out something small quickly. I'm tempted to try and do it using a 3D Printer to create the resist; just as a proof of concept. Even that could dramatically improve the quality of the product and drastically reduce production time.
The problem tends to be the rate at which relatively expensive bits get eaten up. Most people who experimented with the technology seem to have been disappointed or moved on to something more convenient.
As I said, the solutions out there are not yet ready for prime time. In commercial applications it is a mature technology; there are a number of short-turnaround fab houses which make their boards this way already. The problem is the piss-poor quality of what is being produced as inexpensive CNC tables vs similar price range 3DP also being made of 8020 extrusion; it's like they learned NOTHING from the explosion in 3DP.
Speaking as someone with a fair amount of machining experience, bits getting eaten up is caused by poor quality machines and not running at the correct feed speed for the spindle speed, which is ALSO caused by poor quality machinery (and software) that doesn't have a decent motor and speed control.
This is STUPID, as I can buy a good quality BL Motor that will develop 1/2 a HP AND the speed control to run it, some of which can even be programmed with governor FW, for ~US$20 combined. Sometimes less, if it's on sale. Yet they STILL insist on trying to make this stuff work with steel can brushed Mabuchi motors.
As a prototyping/one-off solution, I believe it could be easily brought in under $200 (which I'd gladly pay, if usable software was available) with 8020 extrusion construction; the weak point is the software, which at this point is barely better than trying to write gcode from a text editor. We need something like Cura to take Gerbers and Eagle files and make the GCode for a small router table.
That said, I still don't believe it would be good for anything even remotely approaching production quantities.
mnem
*taxified*