I just bought an FTDI cable, and I noticed that the driver was automatically recognized in Windows 10. Another thing I noticed is that the color pattern that arrived here is different from the one commonly used on the internet. This corresponds to the following link:
https://rocstor.com/product/rocstor-premium-cisco-usb-console-cable-usb-type-a-to-rj45-rollover-cable/However, the pin order follows the Cisco pattern and does not alter its functionality:
| FTDI Cable | Description | New Color Pattern |
|------------|-------------|-------------------|
| 1 Brown | CTS | Black |
| 2 Purple | DSR | Brown |
| 3 Yellow | RXD | Red |
| 4 Red | GND | Orange |
| 5 Black | GND | Yellow |
| 6 Orange | TXD | Green |
| 7 Blue | DTR | Blue |
| 8 Green | RTS | Purple |
I followed your recommendations and arranged the pin order according to the photo you sent me. I also wrote a small program that tests the behavior of the RTS, DTR, and TXD output pins, which I am attaching. The program can work in conjunction with a cheaper network tester (network testers use GND on pin 4 and work perfectly for our purpose).
To summarize, I have not yet succeeded in connecting with the THS. I also noticed that if I connect a network cable and the network tester, pressing the Hardcopy button does not produce any variations in the outputs (I am sending a short video). I now suspect that the serial chip of the THS (hacked THS720P (FV 1.08)from THS710A) might be defective, but I have no way to quickly verify this without another THS to compare with. If anyone has one and could perform this test, it would be helpful...