Posting my findings after having this meter for a day and returning it. Here are my general ramblings in no particular order.
To be fair, I'm a hobbyist and I've used a Fluke 175 for the past 10 years. I basically wanted a convenient bench meter that was easy to use and read. I'd never owned a bench multimeter and decided to try the Siglent because it looked great and I'd had great experience with my Rigol 'scope.
I did not like the way this meter "felt", if that makes sense. It's slow, so naturally having read all the threads on it, I downloaded the latest firmware which made it faster, but "faster" felt like it was overclocked instead of feeling more responsive. Even with the newer firmware a continuity check was not instantaneous and my overwhelming feeling after testing it for hours was that I just didn't trust it. Everything about it just felt cheap to me and for the price, I returned it and bought a used Fluke (though that's got its own issues).
It takes too long to boot. I know it's a linux box and that's cool, but that also annoyed me. Yes, I know it should sit for a while to stabilize so boot time shouldn't be a big deal, but my Fluke bench meter is instantly on.
The screen drove me nuts. It's not as beautiful as it is in the pics, and there was no way to adjust either the brightness or the contrast. If I'd have been able to get that pure black that's shown in the marketing pics I would have been a bit more enthusiastic. I love the screen on the Rigol 'scope, so that was my baseline.
The always-on blue power light is terrible.
For reference, I'm not really a gear snob, but I like what I like. I have a Rigol DS1054Z that I love and I have none of these complaints about it except for maybe the boot time.
I loved some of the advanced features like the trending screens and such, but I just couldn't get past the feeling that I'd spent a fair chunk of money on something that I wasn't happy with so I returned it.