But in the case of triggers:
That one is very annoying. One would probably try to get a persistant trigger with many trigger types. But changing the source all the time is a pain in the a***. If you forget this one time, you get confused again.
Please explain what you mean.
-----------
I also have one friendly recommendation.
Would it be too much to ask if you spent, say, one intensive week and learned how to use this oscilloscope as it is? And not so that you have usage patterns and expectations of how the functions should work and then you should change all those that don't go the way you assume they should. After all, we are many different people with different expectations and experiences and possibly learned ways. It would become an extremely confusing and difficult-to-manage device if all the functions were to suit everyone's taste. I think that when you buy a car, after that you learn how to use its different things and adapt to it, pretty soon you get used to using it even though it feels different from the previous one at first.
In learning, you have to remember both learning new things and habits AND, very important, also unlearning some things. Each of the latter is sometimes very important. And sometimes laborious and slow, depending on how deep the old habits are rooted in the "cores".
I myself have encountered this often. Sometimes I used a lot of Tek oscilloscopes and other devices. Then when I had to use HP oscilloscopes... at first I felt that these were working completely wrong. Until the old dog learned new ways.
I haven't had any trouble adapting to using, for example, the SDS800X HD now, any more than the SDS2000X HD or SDS3000X HD, even though I've used a huge number of completely different oscilloscopes for about 60 years.
Of course, there are mistakes to be corrected, as well as things to be developed. But the development has to be done with extreme consideration and taking into account many (!) more variables, etc. than initially comes to mind.
There is also the fact that it is simply not possible to make something like, for example, an oscilloscope with a user interface that satisfies everyone. Some users just have to either adapt to the ones they don't like or find a more suitable one. The same goes for all tech gadgets, really.
One important point must always be kept in mind. Repairing the intact is not always wise. Those who think that an intact device is broken or working well should act differently, maybe they should change their perception or at least question the need for change.