Have you actually watched the video youself, or do you only repeat what others said about me?
I have the luck (?) to be human, and not a parrot, so of course I have watched the video*.
Part of this luck is that humans have developed this very powerful tool, called "language", enabling us to convey sophisticated concepts in a - sometimes - concise and clear way.
A 10 seconds video with no explanation is not that.
This has probably been told you a number of times, but a decent way to report suspected bugs is:
- A slogan, to help set the topic.
E.g., "Triggering on both edges shows garbled trace" - What I was doing, including any particular setup (no, not the .xml, which might help in some case as additional info) but a description.
E.g, "I was observing a square wave at 1 MHz, 2 Vpp from my AWG, connected with a direct BNC cable". - The, and this is fundamental, steps to reproduce the suspected problem.
E.g, "I changed triggering from rising edge to both edges" - What was the expected result.
E.g, "I expected the scope to show two strong, almost uninterrupted, lines at the top and bottom, and faint lines where the transitions occur" - What is the actual result.
E.g., "The display contains many horizontal lines at unexpected levels" - A suspected cause, if known.
- Possible workarounds, if any
It looks like the two features are mixed together here.
Now I see it. Of course I cannot reproduce it, that's why step 3 is paramount.
And, of course, you did it again while I was writing this. At least there's a slogan and a hint on how to reproduce, which makes it much easier to give an answer.
"Issue" frequency measurment wrong on zooming out:
When zooming out, the measurement of the frequency yields wrong values.
Nyquist. You are severely undersampling the signal. Trace measurements work on the samples, not on the actual analog signal. See chapter 18.12 in the User Manual, but in addition to that I would suggest some introductory text to digital signal processing (Lyons? Is that still around?), I have the impression you miss some of the fundamentals.
* I don't always do that - but I don't answer if I haven't.
You were, for reasons I don't honestly remember, in my ignore list
long before you started the barrage of posts on Rigol and Siglent scopes and AWGs. I still open some from time to time, according to the reactions and my willingness to be entertained.