SDS1102CNL vs SDS1102CML (100Mhz)

[10101]

SDS1102CNL  vs  SDS1102CML

Could anyone say wich is the best and why please (if there is any relevant diference) ?

Thanks in advance

[BloodyCactus]

I believe the CML has more memory, but still a pittance compared to the rigol 1054z

[tautech]

SDS1102CNL  vs  SDS1102CML

Could anyone say wich is the best and why please (if there is any relevant diference) ?

Thanks in advance

The only relevant difference between these models is the memory depth, 40 Kpts vs 2Mpts.
For other than detailed examination of a captured waveform it is unlikly you will see much difference.

Both models have 1 Gsa/s sampling that is shared between both channels.

The Siglent DSO range has an advantange over most compeditors with 400 V channel input ratings.
This means more safety for your scope if the need arises to examine HV waveforms.
Errors in usage also have a larger margin of error without damaging the scope.