@AltemirI have one question about page 1. table and calculations. I know there may be different opinions about this but I will ask exactly Altamir opinion.
(this table:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/rigol-mso4000-and-ds4000-tests-bugs-firmware-questions-etc/?action=dlattach;attach=75877;image )
There is
Samplerate 4G
2ns/div
"sample size" 700 (700 samples = 1 waveform lenght ?)
Blind time 0.981
waveform update rate / s (wfms/s) meaning is afaik qcquired and displayed waveform / s.
But what is blind time (invisible time amount from total time)
4GSa/s is 8 sample points in one dvision with this 2ns/div.
Rigol display is 14 divs. It means that visible waveform lenght is 112 datapoints.
With this setting you have measured 106790 wfms/s
1 waveform in every ~9360ns
Blind time (for user eye) is 9248ns and visible time is 112ns.
If total time is 1 then visible time is 0.01197
Question: what you think which one is visible (not blind) time. 112 sampled points time or 700 sampled (but mainly not visible) points time.
Which one is better in practice for user: Real time displayed part from total time or acquired part from total time (if they are not equal)
In this case it is not big deal 112 in 700 but some scopes may have much more. Example oscilloscope where is 20k minimum memory, 1GSa/s sampolerate max and example 2ns/div timescale and if 14 divisions wide it have 28 sample points visible and 19972 sample points invisible (but acquired). How it is wise to calculate blind time. Do it need think visible part or whole captured part.
If I use oscilloscope for some rare glitches I will mostly watch screen or leave it with infinite persistence. (also it do not work mostly for this part what is outside of display memory)
I vote displayed sample size.
Ref:
http://cdn.rohde-schwarz.com/dl_downloads/dl_application/application_notes/1er02/1ER02_1e.pdf