I just re-viewed the videos by Martin. The Flir DM93 looks like a really well built Uni-T instead of a Fluke or Brymen. The biggest things I don't like is the big shiny plastic window and panel that will show its age very quickly after it gets used a bit and I really don't like the totally integrated case and its molded in probe holders. The input protection and input layout look very well done. The test leads look to be from the same manufacturer as Brymen uses. 100 hours operation on 6 AAA batteries?
![Face Palm :palm:](https://www.eevblog.com/forum/Smileys/default/facepalm.gif)
The operation of the meter seems to be nice and fairly logical. It has good specs and has all the features most people would want. The things it has over some other meters in this class is the internal data logging and Bluetooth. If they eventually supply software to connect to it that is free then this is a big plus. I see on the google play store that there is a free app for the infrared instruments. To me, at this point, this looks like a Uni-T UT71X series done the right way.
What can this be compared to?
Well the Brymen BM525 has similar accuracy, only 10,000/6000 count, better built IMHO, internal 87,000 logging at up to 20 times per second, and costs around $315 USD shipped to your door, if you include the data cable.
The Agilent U1271A can be had for around $350 plus shipping, if applicable, and the bluetooth module costs around another $50. It has similar accuracy and some more features. So for the same price, would you get the Agilent or the Flir? I think with the 300 hour battery life on 4 AAA batteries might be a big decision point too.