Actually, I still like the intensity grading of the DS1000Z series better, not to speak of the higher models of this heritage...
I just revisited the older posts on DHO intensity grading, prompted by the observed difference to the DS1054Z in blargg's video. There were some earlier comments that the DHO's grading does not look as convincing as on other scopes, including Rigol scopes.
It looks to me like
the DHO800/900 varies the pixel intensity only based on how often a pixel was redrawn. In contrast, the DS1054Z (and many other scopes) also take into account
how fast the "beam" was moving when drawing the trace. I.e. if there is a lower density of actual acquisition points, say on the fast edge of a signal, the interpolated line is rendered dimmer on the DS1054Z, but not on the DHO.
Visible in TurboTom's photo (re-attached here) along the envelope of the modulated signal, which is brighter only on the DS1054Z. (Because the carrier frequency "takes a slow turn" at its peaks.) And visible in blarrg's video, a few posts above, where the DS1054Z shows a marked contrast between the fast edges vs. the high/low logic states of the signal, but the DHO does not. (Except for the low state in some areas, which occurs more
often.)
Does this make sense? Maybe a DHO owner can specifically confirm or refute this theory by looking at suitable test signals?