Don't expect it to be as good as Micsig. Probably even HDO1000/4000 with bigger screen,at this stage of development does not have touch as well made as for instance Micsig that is something you are familiar with. Micsig has been doing it for a long time now. Rigol still has to learn all the details of how it's done.
We'll see.
It's true that Micsig does some things in a particular way that would horrify an engineer but in practice work well enough once you realize that you don't NEED perfect accuracy for most things.
Micsig also has the "fine" buttons at the bottom that let you make single pixel adjustments to the last thing you touched (switching between up/down and left/right depending on what it was). Maybe I'll miss those.
Examples of "weirdness":
a) Input of cutoff frequency for the low pass filter. You have a slider and two buttons to select either "MHz" (digits before the decimal point) and "kHz" (digits after the decimal point) and "+/-" for single digit tweaks. There's
no option to type in a number.
Entering a very precise number like (1.75Mhz)
can be done but it's a pain in the ass and do you really
need that precision? Answer: No. The difference on screen between 1.6Mhz and 1.9Mhz will be half a bee's dick.
b) How about this one for entering the pulse width for triggering? You have a logarithmic scale at the bottom that you can drag with your finger and a fine tuning slider above it which you can drag left/right. Again:
NO option to type in a number.
Engineers will be horrified that you can't type in a number and that everything has to be done with fingers but in practice it's easy, it's fast and it gets the job done. The logarithmic scale maps very well to what you actually
need from this trigger mode.
Would either of those have made it past an initial design meeting at a big corporation? Probably not ... they'd want an input box and an on-screen numeric keypad for entering precise numbers.
Micsig? They did it their way.