Most likely @2N3055 was referring to me. I've posted several findings in the "bugs" and "Bode Plot" threads that weigh in much heavier for me. Basically, the Bode Plot function isn't usable as-is and my take is that Rigol will still need a year to get it right if they prioritize it. I've got an audio project that I want to get done and I basically considered the DHO914S for its stand-alone Bode plot function which basically isn't there. So for that reason, I'll very likely return it -- not for its mediocre intensity grading. While I've got the scope here, I do all the tests that come to my mind and throw all sorts of signals at it and report my findings, my own errors, what's nice and also what's not so much...
And I hope others may find this information helpful for deciding if this scope may be worth getting.
For my own part, as I reported, most of my negative findings would be tolerable since I know I'm just evaluating an entry level scope -- except for the Bode plot failure, which is a show stopper for me. There are many nice and interesting details and features, and I made my own share of errors (suspecting the Scope's ADC for causing a spur in the signal while it was sampling clock feed-trough of the AWG along with a too long, improperly terminated BNC cable that basically caused the spur) that I also report -- somebody may learn from them.
Following all this information is somewhat troublesome since there are at least four threads that directly deal with findings on this new insturment. I guess this may have added its share to the confusion
.