Author Topic: Rigol DHO4000 Series vs Siglent SDS3000X Series  (Read 181 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online strahd_von_zarovichTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 22
  • Country: tr
Rigol DHO4000 Series vs Siglent SDS3000X Series
« on: Today at 08:48:11 am »
Hi everyone,

I am planning to buy a true 12-bit oscilloscope. I am consdering DHO4204 and SDS3034X. DHO4204 is hackable as far as I understand. I don't know if SDS3000 series is hackable right now.

I have a 2Ghz oscilloscope, so I don't really care the bandwitdh difference between two(Rigol(800MHz) - Siglent(1GHz))

Noise performance on SDS3000X is 125uVrms@1GHz, but Rigol doesn't show any data at high frequencies, at least I couldn't find it.

Hdmi on the Rigol is a plus for me, since I use it frequently. Bode function on the Siglent is the feature I need for very long time (It only works with Siglent waveform generator as far as I understand, but I have a SDG6052 function generator. So looks like It will work)

About memory depth both are sufficient.  FFT is important I don't know which one is faster and has better specs.

Can you tell me ? What do you think about their specs, and which one will you choose and why?

Thanks in advance.

 

Online 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7184
  • Country: hr
Re: Rigol DHO4000 Series vs Siglent SDS3000X Series
« Reply #1 on: Today at 09:59:35 am »
Hello!

I personally prefer SDS3000xHD.

In short, SDS3000xHD is more advanced in analysis features.
It has measurements with statistics and histicons. Trend and track plots.
Advanced arbitrary formula math. Good FFT.
Bode plot would not only work with sdg6052X, but works completely plug and play and. Make note Bode plot is multichannel.
SDS3000xHD is also MSO. That means it is actually 4 analog + 16 digital scope. Etc.etc.
Better DC accuracy. Very large input offset ranges.

Truth is, if you only use scope for "only looking at the waveforms", both scopes will do.

If you want to know which scope is more advanced measurement instrument, that is SDS3000xHD.
Also, SDS3000xHD is still in active development where all kinds of features are being added to the platform.

DHO4000 haven't seen much development in 2 years AFAIK. Rigol is also not famous for good FW debug process. I don't know but I would presume that in 2 years at least critical bugs were ironed out by now, though.

Since both are not exactly pocket money, I would recommend trying them if you can...
 

Online strahd_von_zarovichTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 22
  • Country: tr
Re: Rigol DHO4000 Series vs Siglent SDS3000X Series
« Reply #2 on: Today at 11:08:11 am »
Thank you so much for your detailed answer.

What about hacking? Can SDS3034X be upgraded to SDS3104X?
 

Online 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7184
  • Country: hr
Re: Rigol DHO4000 Series vs Siglent SDS3000X Series
« Reply #3 on: Today at 11:36:58 am »
Thank you so much for your detailed answer.

What about hacking? Can SDS3034X be upgraded to SDS3104X?

I leave that to others. I do not have much knowledge about how that goes. There is some difference in licensing between models so not all are the same.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf