So from a practical point of view: what things will I be missing out by getting the Siglent SDS1000X-U instead of the (much nicer looking) SDS2000X PLUS?
In addition to the differences listed by tautech, here are some more features the SDS2104X Plus has to offer:
- 1 ppm time base accuracy
- Low noise frontend, comparable to the best in class
- Selectable 50 ohms input impedance (indispensable for direct coax connections and signals whose spectra significantly exceed 100MHz)
- Advanced two channel freeform math, including average and extended resolution
- Advanced trigger suite with holdoff by time or event for most of the triggers
- Zone trigger as a refinement for most triggers
- Selectable alternative representation formats for automatic and cursor measurements
The list might still be incomplete...
Edit: time base accuracy added
Timebase accuracy depends also how we define it. Or do we define it like some peoples claim GPS OCXO accuracy over 8 hour average ...
It depends do we mean 10, 100 or 1000 second average or something else.
1ppm accuracy inside 100s time window is ok for oscilloscope but there is other much more critical thing. Jitter, short time jitter.
Now lets take this 1ppm just for thinking. If there is 1ppm peak to peak jitter it mean that over 10ms period there can be 10ns p-p jitter and it is not good at in this class of scope. It is acceptable in 1kX-U but not in 2kXPlus..
Comparing jitter. Both run parallel and get same signal what signal itself jitter is here just nonsense. (very low jitter free running high grade DOCXO - no continuous discipline for avoid discipline changes). Freq 10.000000MHz+/-0.2Hz As can see in images SDS2104XPlus jitter in this test is around 0.02ppm peak - peak
SDS1104X-U jitter in this test is over 0.45ppm peak-peak
Of course both test include source jitter (nonsense) and then trigger jitter, also nearly nonsense here.
I have not measured at all what is time base accuracy but looks like SDS2104XPlus is less than 0.4ppm off.
SDS1104X-U is more off but not measured. Trigger counter show 10.0000 continuously.
SDS2014XPlus trigger counter display 9.999996 and 9.999997 last digit changing continuously between 6 and 7.
In these images both scopes have 30s persistence. I have also watched over half hour both scopes parallel with this same signal and not notable slower drift.
SDS2104XPlus time jitter is - very good. Very good! Around 0.02ppm peak to peak.
Also SDS1104X-U time jitter is, imho, not bad in its class. under 0.5ppm peak to peak.
Of course these are just only individual one scopes. Both are random individual new ones not selected.
Note. Signal level is 1.6Vp-p and pure sine. 20mV/div is for get slope more steep. Due to this it also overdrive input circuits. Effect can clearly see specially in SDS X-U image where result is S shape. SDS XPlus have less this effect. Yes this is "wrong use" but only what matters here is timing, not vertical....so.
Just -- pay more get more/better.