Before update there was 2kSa/s maximum samplerate in scan mode. Now it is 5MSa/s.
"Repetitive" (some times called littlebit loosy as Equal-Time) mode is not very interesting feature in scope what have 1GSa/s (or 500MSa/s) what is classified as 100MHz oscilloscope. In history it was meaningfull. Example in 100MHz oscilloscope what have 10MSa/s maximum samplerate. Of course it need repetitive sampling for continuous signals, but this kind of oscilloscope is only <2-4MHz oscilloscope if talking single shot) Mostly but not always this Egu-Time is more like "feature of the ad men".
If look 100MHz oscilloscope what have 1GSa/s samplerate it is nearly so that there is misunderstooding if want this repetitive sampling mode. Yes in some rare cases if it is well done it may give something but veru marginal. Sometimes it make situation only more bad.
Owon have so wide front end that it may be very easy 250MHz oscilloscope (for 2 channels together) if there is implemented good repetitive mode. But why, it is 100MHz oscilloscope what reads in front panel, and it is 200MHz 1 channel and 150MHz 2 channel oscilloscope if look test data (but this is not quarateed by owon, it is only measured and true as long as they change something)
If I hope some real advantage to this scope, it is user adjustable hardware done adjustable brick wall filter in analog front end.
And variable (fine step) for V/div.
Windowed zoom... hmm nice for play, but not really needes for real working and just becouse this not windoved zoom is implemented so that it is very fast use.
In stop mode it is easy to go around long capture, just zoom out, horz position shift and zoom in. But if there is settable mark points and posibility to jump marks.. of course there is many things what are nice.
It store only .bin files but they can translate easy to .csv or .xls
Sin(x)/x it use this only with fastest timebases. Can no on/off.
But if have time and want "play". Becouse it have deep fast memory, it keeps 1GSa/s up to very low sampleartes. So it can look with lower speed, stop and zoom in. There is just lines between samples or only sampled dots. But this is just playing.
If afraid Sin(x)/x it is good to stay away from example Rigol what have been wrong implemented Sinx/x and it is better call it as some kind of "smooth".
I think here is nothing wrong:
http://i.cmpnet.com/planetanalog/2009/02/Sin(x)x_Agilent.pdfIn signal quality Owon is good but FW have not so much features but all essentials for normal real working. (in this price class).
Most important is capturing quality. If we have garbage in oscilloscope generator, what to analyze?
But yes, if Owon have all Hantek or equal features in FW (without tons on bugs and better implemented ) and Owon HW, well... I want it and also price can be higher.