and i don't like mine, it will be replaced as soon as possible (probably with the new keysight, if it doesn't come out to be a disaster like the new tek tbs)
*also i need canbus on the home bench, another reason to toss out the rigol but let's not digress
infact i said
I find them to be a joke. i know plenty of people that are happy with the rigol. having spent more time with better tools i am not one of them but YMMV
Auto set is implemented just fine in a picoscope, an example without having to go crazy high with the price. auto baud detection doesn't work 100% of the time though, especially with CAN, and you still have to select the polarity but 99% of the time you select the trace and click ok, just fine
My problem with the rigol decoder is that as with almost everything else in the scope it tries to decode with screen data, which is decimated. have a full 24M trace? you're out of luck. you have to zoom in enough that the effective sample rate permits the decode to work or you have wrong/missing results so to find an event you have to zoom in and scan the whole trace manually. with a picoscope, a gds-2000e and other, better tools decoding is done on the whole sample memory, regardless of the zoom.
the rigol behaviour slows me down to a painful point, but for other people is fine