Apollo11fan, I appreciate your perspective and agree with the points being made.
That said, I try to consider the context from the manufacturer's side as well. Being relatively new in the oscilloscope market and offering highly competitive prices means they likely face hardware limitations and resource constraints. They may also outsource some work, which can complicate development and testing, especially when aiming for ambitious goals like the possible release (just guessing) of a 100Mhz scope at a similar price point .
For me, as someone who remembers when oscilloscopes were much more expensive and only found in labs, getting a two-channel 40+MHz battery-powered scope with a decent display and a multi-meter for $65 is impressive (probe(s) included). It may have quirks, but it functions as intended. For more serious work, however, this or any other affordable handheld meter might not be suitable. Spending a bit more on brands like Hantek or Owon might offer better options, though they have their own issues too.
Could you provide some examples of the trace artifacts you've encountered, like the waveform discontinuities? That would help in understanding the extent of the issues.