I knew that. I was asking so that I could determine if it was best to buy a SA with a TG, or if the VNA I also intend to get would do the job just fine.
The architectures of the 2 instruments are different. So I was asking because, for all I know, the SA could do stuff with a TG, that a VNA wouldn't otherwise be able to do.
I cannot read your mind to determine what you already know (and others clearly cannot either from the responses). We simply answered based as best as we could.
You didn't mention (in the original post) if the decision was between either an SA+TG, or both SA+TG
and a VNA.
I now think you meant to say something something along the lines of:
"If I intend to purchase both a spectrum analyzer instrument and a VNA instrument, should I, in addition, purchase a tracking generator feature? Why would anyone use the SA's TG feature if they also happen to own a VNA?"
If that's what you meant, then there are circumstances where one might prefer to use the SA+TG instead of VNA. For one, unless you've got a very high-end VNA, the dynamic range of the SA is higher. Also with SA+TG you'll be able to see measurements that otherwise might be buried in noise. But they won't be vector measurements. Also, less (and simpler) measurement calibration to do. Plus, some additional features may only be available with the SA and not with the VNA, and there may be differences in sweep speed.