I'm sorry I do not have any documentation, but I have made and used these.
To the best of my experience and understanding though, it is not true that they excessively load the RF circuits under test.
When the capacitors charge after initial connection, so long as the meter being used--such as a VTVM or DMM--has sufficient DC input resistance, there is virtually no current draw from, or into, the quadrupler. The only loading is the reactance of the probe tip, diode(s) (which is/are usually a very low capacitance point contact type, and the ground leads. The ground leads are usually only 3 or for inches long and connect to the probe handle ground shield for this reason (rather than a long ground back to the meter. The only thing past the first diode is DC, and it is charged almost instantly to the peak voltage of the RF. From that point on, the only current draw is that which the VTVM draws.
I personally have not found any significant change in output voltage to input voltage for ordinary radio frequencies, and I suspect the nomograph, if supplied, is more for the voltage nonlinearity of these passive devices when reading low RF voltages such as less than 150mV or so.
These devices--even homebrew, with a little care--can easily output a predictable output voltage into a sensitive, high impedance meter when reading only a few millivolts RMS at several MHz. However, the diodes are then operating in the "square law" region, where the diode is not fully turned on, but is conducting with a higher reverse resistance than the forward resistance and the output DC voltage is a function of the square of the input AC voltage. This is the way the diodes operate when they are well below their normal knee voltage. Therefore, the output voltage to input is very low and nonlinear as the signal increases. Above a certain AC (RF) input, they again become linear--or very close to it.
A scale can be applied to the face of an analog dial to compensate for this, but few people would mark up their meter face, and in either case, they would need the nomograph or some such conversion chart to do it in the first place.
Typical crystal diode or vacuum tube RF voltage doubler probes will operate relatively flat into the hundreds of MHz, if properly designed.
The best I could do is perhaps post a list of input vs output voltages at low signal levels if that might help interpret the service data, but I have no way of comparing my data to data obtained from an unknown device, of course.
cheers
Rob
Edit: After further testing side by side with both probe types, I did find that though both types are useful, the quadrupler probe does load my radio circuits more than the single diode doubler type. The single diode type may in fact be the more useful one for signal tracing of this kind, after all.