tautech, could you predict the results of the poll about how many rigol users would know about this if it wasn't for people tinkering with everything.
measuring is not tinkering with everything.
creep is correct, there is a fair amount of exaggeration going on here...
now we have all sorts of bugs
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/rigol-dso-trigger-position-offset-w-ac-coupled-trggering-ds2000-mso1000/msg557017/#msg557017but will that prevent me from using the scope?
nope.
perhaps i'll find some more, but...heh....none of these bugs is really "into your face" type of bug...
tell me about alternatives in that price range?
Siglent SDS1102CML ?
memory depth?
also, when did this
Rigol itself can currently not manufacture as many devises as needed at the moment.
happen last time in the world of dsos?
here's the deal: that scope is excellent value for money even if they never fix any of the bugs reported.
now, how will you prove me wrong?
you'll suggest we
all need ac trig and absolute precision when scrolling thru the 'live' waveform?
meh...
i can't even mention the third thing i linked above, it's just too silly....
we should all report these bugs (or better to say emind ourselves of them) when we bump into them
while using the scope for a purpose (not just play), then it would all seem a bit different...heh...
again, rigol should correct it, but these are small bugs for most of us.
and others will probaby have a 'proper' (
) scoep to check against.
People rightly expect these things to be accurate, their designs and projects rely on it.
i don't expect perfection in any human or any machine humans make.
is there a better scope for 350eur?
see?
bert
NZ Siglent Distributor......