What I really want to see is if the BM786 in 60k count is snappier than Keysight's U1282A.
It'll do 10 times/sec updating in capture mode, so fast it's a bit disconcerting.
Thank you. I meant the settling rate of the autorange but that is quite a good rate as well.
After watching Joe's video, I could tell the two seem to use different approaches for the autorange. I did a side-by-side comparison timing with the ohms and capacitance ranges (the ones where the lag is larger). Joe mentioned 15s to settle on the 40M measurement, while my Keysight was about 2s. This was becoming less dramatic as resistance decreased, with a crossing point of performance somewhere (didin't verify) and the Keysight becomes slower to the point of taking almost 6s to read my 33 ohms resistor, while the Brymen becomes significantly faster.
Conductivity tests were similar in speed (perhaps because there are not many ranges to cycle).
I also saw an edge for the Keysight on the capacitance - not very dramatic, but both seem to pale in comparison to others such as the 87V, the UT61E or the U1273A. Voltages and current seemed quite equivalent.
I took these timings from Joe's video, thus this is not a definitive conclusion to the autorange performance at all.