Thanks for the heads-up on the jitter issue, will have a look into that!
Will.
sorry, the jitter applies to the siglent, i've not heard of issues on the rigol.
I have not seen any real test measurements using Rigol DG1022U or A
In Siglent there was glitch/jitter problem in Square Wave but it have been solved by Siglent long time ago. Also Rigol specs claims this same jitter as Siglent in Square wave and I have not meet false in Siglent data sheet for SDG1000 series. 0.1% jitter is of course 100ns if cycle time is 100us. Exept if Rigol % is better % than Siglent %. Of course in Rigol fan club rigol % is better %.
But then in other things Siglent SDG1025 outperforms this Rigol DG1022 nearly in all things.
Rigol have 100MHz samplerate. Siglent 125MHz.
Rigol have 2 channels but... only channel 1 can modulate. Ch1 have 4k arm memory. Ch2 have 1k.
Ch1 is 14 bit but Ch2 is 10bit. Square can only to 5MHz. Risetime specs just under 35ns.
Siglent, both channels have all same features, exept maximum output level.
Both channels can of course use all modulations, both have 14bit resolution, both have 16k arb memory. Also siglent Square wave jitter is specified as 0.1%. (same as Rigol) But Siglent square wave go to 25MHz and risetime is under 12ns and in forum you can find true measurements about risetimes and also about jitter. Can you find real tests with Rigol?
Low jitter square wave for low frequencies can of course produce using pulse function instead of using Square wave if 0.1% jitter is too much. (same for Rigol) It is also good to remember that Siglent display is more informative. Building quality is good.
Old comparator glitch problem is solved and there is not jitter/glitch issue in Siglent SDG1000.
Today also Siglent support have developed better and it continue.
I believe Siglent SDG1025 is lot of more features and quality for money than this Rigol DG1022.