May I give this topic a bump, just once?
I would be really interested in your experience with the logic analyser functionality in Rigol scopes. Specifically, can it analyse signals with a reasonable oversampling, or does it need absurd oversampling (like 50 or 100 times the signal clock speed) to give stable decoding and triggering? Any other reports on hands-on experience would be welcome as well!
In the DHO800/900 series, the logic analyser functionality does not come cheap: Add $200 for the DHO914 model (over the 804), then add another $300 for the logic analyser probe (which is a nice one, with pogrammable thresholds and a large input voltage range up to 40V). But on paper, the resulting logic analyser is comparable to e.g. a Saleae Logic Pro 16, which sells for $1500.
So, how do these two options compare in practice? As mentioned in the OP, I am aware of the usability advantages of a PC-based solution, but would see compensating benefits in the all-in-one solution in the DHO900. Hence am mainly interested in a comparison of the sampling/processing/triggering/decoding power of the Rigol. Many thanks for your comments!