0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Why it so deep? Is it to provide compatibility by dimensions with analog scopes?
Cute. If it was 50$ with free shipping I'd get one just for giggles. It's adorable.
If they made it 100MHz/1GHz, like the old Tek TDS200 series, and it was that current US$150 price, there might be a niche market for such a slim benchtop single channel scope.
Quote from: EEVblog on September 10, 2019, 11:11:03 pmIf they made it 100MHz/1GHz, like the old Tek TDS200 series, and it was that current US$150 price, there might be a niche market for such a slim benchtop single channel scope.Wait, I just realised it doesn't have a single shot mode?
Quote from: Alex Eisenhut on September 07, 2019, 05:08:04 pmCute. If it was 50$ with free shipping I'd get one just for giggles. It's adorable.I might have to get one for shits and giggles
If it were a TDS200 class unit even if only 50 megs I’d have bought it. But it’s not. It’s poo. I really like the form factor. It’s like the old Japanese scopes.
I don't think this has anything to do with that crappy oscilloscope and the "thinking" behind it ...
Quote from: CDaniel on September 10, 2019, 04:33:47 amI don't think this has anything to do with that crappy oscilloscope and the "thinking" behind it ...Compare the Power Supply's case to the Oscilloscope's case. They re-used the mechanical design of the power supply case to make the oscilloscope. They produced a new control panel, but the position of the screen, the layout of the ridges on the sides of the screen and below the screen, are identical.
Their reasoning was that they where easier to teach.
Quote from: nctnico on September 08, 2019, 11:32:11 am Their reasoning was that they where easier to teach.translation : the teachers didn't have to learn anything newer ...