The distinction between "Educational" and "Hobby" is academic, at best.
Pushing tools not sold to private individuals as "Educational" stinks of bait-and-switch trickery to me.
How so? Its just facing reality.
So is bending over when someone bigger than you wants to bugger you in the arse.
The main markets for low end instruments are education and production test.
How do you define "education" as a market, when considering
tools specifically? That is my point.
(And I think you are using
instruments because you don't want to think of other tools at similar price ranges that are common in e.g. vocational schools.)
It is very common for interested students to obtain the same tools they use at school for their own use, so they get getter at their use, and because they want to get better at what they're studying by doing their own hobby projects.
But the key stinky bit to me is, if you want students to use your tools, why would you not want skilled hobbyists to use those tools also? What the hell kind of a business model is it that makes a difference between the two? It is common for the same tools sold on to hobbyists ("consumer market") to cost much more, sure; but that's not what Keysight is doing. They
could, but they don't want to. Why? (That's a rhetorical question. I'm not interested in yours and others' further speculation on the reason, there's enough of it in this thread already. Point being, Keysight is
not telling us the reason they don't want to sell (at higher prices) to hobbyists and other private consumers.)