It's not a lateral move and would probably take some adjustment. Whether it is a good choice or not depends a lot on how you use it.
The SDS2000X+ main pros would be the larger screen, low-noise front end with 10-bit mode, much more memory (200M vs 10K), all options included or hackable (power analysis, FFT, advanced triggering, etc etc),. Others may suggest features they think are important as there is much, much more. The cons, relative to the Tek TDS3054B are (again, IMO, YMMV) the lower sample rate, no TekProbe interface and a bit more obtuse AI and general setup. My main gripe is the way that MATH channels are set up and that the ERES and AVG function are only done in separate MATH channels--of which there are only two.
If you think the Tek is 'overkill' for you and you don't need 5GSa/s and TekProbe, then the SDS2000X+ might offer you some advanced features that are useful. The 200M samples allow you to capture at incredibly slow rates and still zoom way in. To be specific, you can capture at 10ms/div and zoom in to 1ns/div/.
The TDS3054B is still a very nice scope and there's a reason they still sell for big bucks on eBay. A more 'fair' comparison based on class and price would be the Siglent SDS5000X series.
Maybe give some specific examples of how you use the scope and you might get some more informative comments.