Author Topic: The right choice of digital oscilloscope  (Read 7772 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gandalf_Sr

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1729
  • Country: us
Re: The right choice of digital oscilloscope
« Reply #50 on: September 23, 2019, 08:41:22 am »
I think the only Keysight below $700 is the DSOX1102A. 70MHz, 2 channel, 1Mpts, 2GSa/S, 50k Wfms/s (not including hacks)

It's actually a 2+1 channel MSO, but who's counting...?  :popcorn:

Thanks, I agree that wasn't well explained by Keysight.  This makes the DSOX1102A a much better scope than 'normal' 2 channel scopes IMHO.
If at first you don't succeed, get a bigger hammer
 

Offline Mortymore

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 468
  • Country: pt
Re: The right choice of digital oscilloscope
« Reply #51 on: September 23, 2019, 09:12:54 am »
I think the only Keysight below $700 is the DSOX1102A. 70MHz, 2 channel, 1Mpts, 2GSa/S, 50k Wfms/s (not including hacks)

It's actually a 2+1 channel MSO, but who's counting...?  :popcorn:



That is the sort of thing that I would expect, after a few years of hibernation with a TDS210 and a TEK2445, that all modern 2 ch scopes would do.

EDIT: It's a digital world, and in a scope with decode options, a 3rd input is obviously handy, and should not be that demanding to implement. Or so I think...
« Last Edit: September 23, 2019, 09:38:41 am by Mortymore »
 

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7276
  • Country: hr
Re: The right choice of digital oscilloscope
« Reply #52 on: September 23, 2019, 09:18:52 am »
I think the only Keysight below $700 is the DSOX1102A. 70MHz, 2 channel, 1Mpts, 2GSa/S, 50k Wfms/s (not including hacks)

It's actually a 2+1 channel MSO, but who's counting...?  :popcorn:

Thanks, I agree that wasn't well explained by Keysight.  This makes the DSOX1102A a much better scope than 'normal' 2 channel scopes IMHO.

Well it is nice, but SPI decoding for MOSI and MISO at the same time still doesn't work (or at least it says so in a manual).
So you get same decoding for SPI as 2 ch + timeout...
For decoding you really need 4ch scope.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf