Q. Does that mean the rest of us can't/shouldn't talk about the USB hacks?
First of all for most ppl a DSO is a measurment device and they will use it for measurments.
However, a manufacturer can't stop ppl playing around, there will be always someone who will touch the hardware\firmware
and always someone talking about, so of course you can talk about it, why not.
You can be sure that this hack will not work forever, sooner or later Han/Tekway will change FPGA design or CPLD design
or even PCB design to provent hacks. For now all they can do was to change the software. If i release a new USB hack they
will again release new software protection - and to be very honest i think there are more important tasks on their to-do list
than new hack-protection.
The SDK was planned for end of January - not yet done, necessary firmware changes are bit buggy so they have to fix them first before SDK
can be released. Additionally Ethernet addon is planned (which is again a big change to firmware) - all these changes are
more important than a "hack for lazy ppl" - which USB hack is.
Someone who knows ARM architecture and familiar with Linux will not destroy DSO by "playing around",
more critical are let say "lazy ppl" who just don't know how to fix if something get wrong during hack.
The USB hack was maybe a good solution for the beginning, but there was also potential risk of device damage.
As i said, i could compile new USB hacks (12 pcs to cover all model changes), but this will increase the risk
(not only for beginners) - which is bad for manufacturer (warranty questions, bad statements about manufacturer and so on).
Therefore no USB hacks (except things which can't harm DSO, like fw-dump/fw-restore, Eth-enabler, whatever),
If you wish to hack buy a UART-> USB converter, learn about linux/vi, and hack via UART - or buy ARM JTAG and S3C2440
based board, backup DSOs NAND content over JTAG, restore to your S3C2440 dev board, hack there is restore back to DSO.