But other way around? There are many images in GEL for DHO1000/DHO4000. I tested it and some of them works the same as original DHO800/900 (BOOT.bin) and some makes distortions in a waveform.
It won't be the other way around either. How can I explain it to you using an example that you can understand... It’s like taking a Linux image compiled for RK3399 and trying to run it on RK3368.
Thats a one (small) step closer to increase sample rate.
This is a small step in an unknown direction with an unknown result. And even with a misunderstanding whether there is any result at all
Did You try this? Or its just me?
I worked with FPGAs, wrote firmware for them. So I know what FPGAs are, how they work, what the binary for them is and how it loads and works.
Two ADC = two cores in FPGA. Probably.
FPGAs have no cores at all. There is not even such a thing as a kernel. In general, with FPGAs everything is very simple - it’s just a lot of elementary logical elements - latches, flip-flops, Look-Up tables. And the binary file simply defines the connections between them. That's all. There are also additional blocks, such as RAM, multipliers, PLLs, transceivers, etc., but they are simply there as auxiliary peripherals.
DDR option works. This is probably related to DMA stuff.
Well, not all options lead to calibration failure. But I know for sure that the crash is caused by even just one option included in addition to the standard ones. I don’t remember which one exactly.