If the waveform update rate is really high for all settings then this maybe the first scope that has both high resolution and fast waveform update rate (>1 MS/sec).
And don't forget deep memory... Keysight is having a very bad day today.
as if the EXR models never existed! Much more comparable on the memory axis, ups and downs on other characteristics.
Keysight EXR is in a different price bracket and it is PC based as well.
Really? want to continue with your misleading statements? EXR's are priced around the same as MSOX4000's (used as a "direct" comparison).
MXO vs MSOX4000 vs EXR USD pricing
4ch 500MHz, 17,205 vs 22,370 vs 22,579
4ch 1GHz, 21,310 vs 26,883 vs 28,255
30% more, retail, comparing a just released (and competitive) model. By your argument the MSOX4000 isn't a target for comparison. Unsurprisingly, new released product does more for somewhat less $$. That's not a different price bracket, or a different performance/tier, or a different target market. They have quite the overlap. As I said in the full quote:
Compared to the competition, R&S are pushing products with broader capabilities covering more ground in a single instrument. Easy to pick one dimension against almost any other specific scope where it excels, since the multidimensional polar diagram (that some manufacturers love for their comparisons) is so large in area, but with only incremental improvement over the best one-trick pony in any one dimension.
There isn't a single direct competitor you can pick out, most brands have 2+ different model lines overlapping this space. R&S are doing good things with well rounded designs, better value for small companies that don't have a fleet of different tools to pick from.