Autorange slowness in all modes ( voltage , resistance , capacitance ... ) makes it pretty useless for any professional use ... This is not a small bug like others .
Could be enough for beginners ( first meter ) , occasional users , fanboys and people who bought it like a toy because they have too many meters . No offence .
Reporting issues is not whining because we can't afford or own something "expensive" like a Fluke
Just try to work on something when you have to wait about 1sec ( an eternity compared with other multimeters ) to switch the ranges up and down , maybe with some fast changing voltage . Annoying is not enough to describe the feeling ... when you have fast meters to compare . Could have 1000 extra features , if the simple ones are not implemented right.
Of course I hope they will resolve all the issues , it is for their own good , this meter can become a Fluke "killer" if they want .
I am offended when you or others decide anyone who is fairly happy with the meter is a 'fanboy'. This meter is my primary professional onsite meter and fulfills that role very accurately and consistently it is certainly not a toy! Clearly we have very different ideas of what is needed and your ideas make you no more a hateboy than I am a fanboy. I have from day one talked about the few issues I had found if you head back to January in these threads you will find that. Grow UP and drop the tags.
Clearly you have missed the point that the multimeter chipset in use is one of the limiting factors with the Auto Range speed and that won't magically change by bringing it up once again
there is clear limits as to what can be done in firmware.
Circuit redesign including possibly different chipsets is not an 'issue' and I very much doubt it would be done in public by the masses as it just won't work. Dave has mentioned this in videos before over another project. If you want to re engineer it go do it sell a mod board, rewrite the firmware for the 'new' light speed chipset, make sure it wont go bang.... We await your design if you go down that path.
Repeatably 'reporting' again the same issues is whining in my book so I guess we will just have to differ. The Auto range was known in January so repeating it AGAIN in what must be for the multiple hundredth time in your post is
Or are you hoping to reach the 1% of the members here who aren't already aware of it?
Perhaps you should broaden your scope too instead of the 90% of your posts you have made about this meter you might discover something better until you find that 'better meter' too has flaws or short comings including Flukes.