I DO NOT INTEND FOR THIS TO BE TAKEN NEGATIVELY!
I find it... interesting how so many people SEEM TO BE genuinely upset that they are unable to get more scope than they paid for.
I'm not attacking, I'm not criticizing, nothing like it; it is just very interesting to me that people genuinely believe that they should be able to upgrade their scope for free. Reading that sentence after I typed it out, you may (incorrectly) infer that I am against this point of view; you are wrong.
I guess my interest here comes from the dichotomy between a market that is quickly moving towards software upgrades like this one, and that the market is full of people who believe that once they've purchased something, they own it.
I know in the EU that the "you bought it, you own it" rule applies, but here in the US, that isn't the case. It should be, but it isn't.
I am just wondering where the split started.