When I requested the "uncut" manual from Siglent, I received it straight away, presumably because I am in contact with the support team at work and they know that I won't tell them off if a calibration goes wrong.
Because there had been problems in the past, so they decided to remove the part from the manual.
I also can't imagine that Siglent only assigns staff to make the procedure "fool proof".
In other words, it will remain as it is now, without calibration instructions.
I could look into it and create a more brain-friendly manual, but I would need time that I don't have, because there are already too many "projects" in my pipeline and such a calibration would definitely be low priority.
In addition, I personally only trust displays from external measuring devices anyway and never rely on the internal displays of loads/generators/supplies.
This is also how "my" test field is set up at work.
Oscilloscopes, multimeters, power analyzers, data recorders, current clamps and differential probes are calibrated, everything else is not.
I "turned" my 1020 into a 1030 last and saved a lot of money and I'm not the only one who did that.
So you could go along and spend some of the money saved on an external calibration.
Because the guys from a measuring laboratory must be able to do this, they not only get the specs from the manufacturer, but also calibration instructions if available.